The McCain in Spain Needs to Explain
John McCain conducted an interview with the Spanish press in which he got confused as to who President (coffee first, post second) Prime Minister Zapatero (of Spain) is. The reporter was more than generous in providing McCain an explanation but McCain sticks to answers that make it clear that he thinks Zapatero is the ruler of a Latin American country that is our “enemy”. McCain’s frequent mentions of Latin America and Mexico while discussing Spain suggest he either doesn’t know where the latter is located geographically or he thinks all Spanish speaking cultures are equatable. Neither road a good route for someone claiming a great deal of foreign policy experience.
Americablog has the audio of the interview (its been translated into Spanish with the English extremely faint in the background) and this take:
Per a post on Josh Marshall’s site, I just listened to an interview John McCain did with a Spanish journalist recently. The interview is in English, but there’s a Spanish translator translating the tape into Spanish at the same time. So the English part is difficult to hear. I am however fluent in Spanish, and what Josh reports is exactly what the Spanish version shows.
Namely, that John McCain didn’t appear to know that Spain was in Europe, or that the leader of Spain was named Zapatero, even after he was told that Zapatero was the leader of Spain.
When asked about Spain and Zapatero, by a Spanish reporter for a Spanish newspaper, McCain responded about Mexico and Latin America. A reader suggested something that Josh had already considered, that perhaps McCain thought the reporter was talking about the Zapatistas in Mexico, the guerilla group. But that’s not possible as the reporter clearly said she was talking about Spain and Spain’s leader, Zapatero. She told McCain this twice. Let me tell you exactly what she asked McCain (per the translation):
“Senator, finally, let’s talk about Spain. If you’re elected president, would you invite President Zapatero to meet with you in the White House?”
McCain then gives this odd answer about America’s friends and America’s enemies. He also, oddly, talks about Mexico (why Mexico? The question was about Spain) and how he’d invite friendly leaders to the White House. She then asks him again, would that invitation include President Zapatero? He says again that he’d have to review relations first, blah blah. She then says again, “so you’d have to wait to see, so would you meet with him in the White House?” He again repeats his weird statement about friends and enemies. McCain also throws in, oddly, to the Spanish reporter, when she’s asking him about meeting the Spanish president, a line about the importance of our relationship with Latin America (this is now the second time he answered a question about meeting the president of Spain with an answer about Latin America). She then says to McCain one last time:
“Okay, but I’m talking about Europe – the president of Spain, would you meet with him?”
This time, there was no room for confusion. McCain then gives this very bizarre answer:
“I will meet with any leader who has the same principles and philosophy as us in terms of human rights, democracy, and freedom and I will stand up to those who do not.”
What does concern about human rights, democracy and freedom have to do with a prerequisite for meeting the president of Spain? Especially when youtold the same paper 5 months ago that you’d be happy to meet with him.
McCain had no idea what was going on in the interview. She specifically told him, twice, that she was talking about Spain and the Spanish president. She’s a Spanish reporter with one of the largest, if not the largest, newspaper in Spain, El Pais. I know this paper, McCain certainly knows this paper (and it’s not like McCain’s staff didn’t tell him who he had the exclusive interview with for ten minutes). She made it clear she was asking about her own country and her own president and Mccain had no clue what she was talking about.
Either McCain had no idea what the woman was talking about when she said “Spain,” and then said “the President of Spain,” repeatedly, or McCain intentionally snubbed the country of Spain tonight for no apparent reason, which is very hard to believe, especially given his earlier interview in which he said he was fine meeting Zapatero. The interview is absolutely bizarre, especially in that it sounds like McCain wasn’t even lucid, it sounds like he simply doesn’t have complete control over his faculties anymore. And judging by the fact that just a few months ago McCain was fine with Zapatero, it sounds like McCain simply wasn’t quite all there any more during the interview. He got horribly confused and didn’t know what was going on.









Haha, I was just getting ready to upload this story. You’re too quick for me.
As for Mexico, the best I can figure is that he got Zapatero confused with Zapatista. However, that explanation requires that McCain knows who the Zapatistas are, and I’m not convinced he has any idea.
The Spanish reporter apparently gave McCain the benefit of the doubt and thought he was confusing Zapatero with Zapatista. She told him that Zapatero is Spain’s president and said it twice.
Oh, also, the whole thing without the Spanish translation over it is here
You didn’t have a draft of your post on this in the queue, did you? If so, I didn’t see it. My bad.
Yeah this would be borderline jaw-dropping if I wasn’t used to the like from Bush, but still.
Calendar
Blogroll
Recent Posts
Most Commented
Recent Comments